FEMA Boss Fired After Remarks To Congress

Cameron Hamilton’s Exit from FEMA: A Story of Internal Clashes and Political Pressure

On May 7, just before heading to Capitol Hill to testify before Congress, acting FEMA Administrator Cameron Hamilton packed up his desk—fully expecting to be fired. That same morning, officials from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), FEMA’s parent agency, had instructed the security team to revoke his credentials and prepare to escort him from the building. FEMA officials pushed back, warning that canceling Hamilton’s testimony would send a troubling signal about instability within the agency. Ultimately, he was allowed to testify.

During the hearing, Hamilton contradicted former President Donald Trump by rejecting the idea of dismantling FEMA, an idea Trump had publicly floated. His dismissal the next day was widely seen as punishment for that testimony. However, sources familiar with the situation told Reuters that Trump loyalists were already eager to remove Hamilton. They believed he wasn’t moving aggressively enough to strip down FEMA’s operations, despite his original appointment as a Trump supporter.

Longtime friend Matt Strickland emphasized that Hamilton knew well in advance that he’d be let go and was not fired specifically for his congressional appearance. DHS, for its part, denied that Hamilton had been fired, stating instead that he had transitioned to a new role at the Department of Education working on school safety and foreign influence in higher education.

Behind the scenes, internal disputes contributed to Hamilton’s ouster. He reportedly clashed with Corey Lewandowski, a close Trump adviser and key aide to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. One major flashpoint involved federal funds granted to New York City to house migrants—funds FEMA later reclaimed. Strickland, who publicly defended Hamilton online, claimed he was fired from his DHS contractor position soon afterward, though DHS said only his employer could terminate him.

Related Posts

Important: Crucial Techniques for Preventing Infections in Your Eyes

As essential sensory organs, our eyes enable us to see and understand the world around us,

26 Pictures That Need A Second Look

Our eyes may lie to us more often than we think. Optical illusions are seen in everyday life. Viral Strange will list some pictures that really need…

Heroic Rescue: Dog Saved from Python Attack!!

In a daring feat, a brave individual rescued a helpless dog from the clutches of an aggressive python.CLICK BELOW..

Chuck Norris Announces Heartfelt Farewell …

In a tearful announcement, legendary martial artist and actor Chuck Norris shared with fans that his long-running and much-loved television show,“Walker, Texas Ranger,” is coming to a…

JD Vance Unleashes Warning to..

During a recent live television appearance, Vice President JD Vance accused “rogue” federal judges of impeding President Donald Trump’s policies and issued a stern and unyielding warning…

Common relationship structures include

Many people confuse love, sex, and commitment, assuming they always come together—but they don’t. Love can be expressed in many non-sexual ways, and sex doesn’t always mean love is present. It’s important to communicate openly with partners about relationship expectations, especially around commitment, emotional intimacy, and sexual activity. Whether someone wants a lifelong monogamous marriage or a casual, non-exclusive relationship, mutual respect and trust are essential. People should discuss whether they want a committed or non-committed relationship, a romantic or platonic bond, a sexual or non-sexual partnership, and whether it should be monogamous or open. Common relationship structures include: Asexual or non-sexual partnerships, often based on emotional bonds. Lifetime mutual monogamy, with one lifelong sexual partner. Serial monogamy, involving exclusive relationships over time. Mutual fidelity in groups, where all involved are faithful within the group. Sexual non-monogamy, including polyamory, open relationships, or casual dating. Relationship structure alone doesn’t determine sexual health risk. STI risk depends on behavior—like the number of partners, testing frequency, and barrier use—not just whether the relationship is monogamous. Healthy relationships, in any form, are built on honesty, consent, communication, and mutual care. Exploring these elements can help people build connections that suit their values and needs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *